4/06/2010

Fantasy Football Rules

Rules
Rev. 3 (August 14th, 2009)

I.               Scoring and Team Roster – See league website (key callouts: 9 starters (QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, TE, DEF, K, non-QB flex player), 8 bench slots (somewhat large, to allow for possible keepers).
II.             Draft and Retaining Players
a.     2009 – Auction
                                               i.     Every team receives the default $200 that goes with an ESPN auction (which will also double as the salary cap – more on that later) to build a team (see ESPN for more details)
b.     2010 and beyond – Standard snake-style draft
                                               i.     2010 and beyond will be a standard, snake-style draft with the order being the inverse order of the standings from the previous year
                                              ii.     $200 salary cap will still be in effect, with $120 allocated to signing drafted players, and $80 allocated to signing returning players (see table below).  Due to each team retaining (4) players, the future drafts will be only 13 rounds in length
                                            iii.     Drafted players will be assigned salaries based on their draft positions. These salaries will be based on the following table (which is based roughly on ESPN consensus auction values)

Round/Pick #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
$53
$51
$49
$47
$45
$43
$41
$39
$37
$35
2
$15
$17
$19
$21
$23
$25
$27
$29
$31
$33
3
$14
$14
$14
$14
$14
$13
$13
$13
$13
$13
4
$11
$11
$11
$11
$11
$12
$12
$12
$12
$12
5
$9
$9
$9
$9
$9
$9
$9
$9
$9
$9
6
$7
$7
$7
$7
$7
$7
$7
$7
$7
$7
7
$4
$4
$4
$4
$4
$4
$4
$4
$4
$4
8
$2
$2
$2
$2
$2
$2
$2
$2
$2
$2
9-13
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
Sum
$120
$120
$120
$120
$120
$120
$120
$120
$120
$120

c.      Retaining Players/Picks
                                               i.     Following the completion of every season, each team will keep up to (4) players on their roster for the next year with a total salary of $80 – this figure can be higher or lower depending on draft pick trading
1.     If a team chooses to keep less than (4) players, the team must:
a.     Announce their intent via email to the league
b.     Drop the number of players under (4) they intend on keeping from their team
c.      Pick up players from waivers who scored no fantasy points and would not be drafted by a competent person to use to bring their keeper balance to (4)
d.     Players picked up in this manner will count as having a next year salary of $1 (this is an exception to rule II.b.ii) and must be dropped before the first game of next season
e.     All this needs to be done as ESPN will require each of us to keep (4) players, so if a team does not wish to keep (4) players, they must not lock up players that could be drafted
                                              ii.     The salary paid to the kept player in the next year is determined using the player’s prior year salary and the number of consecutive years that player has been kept by any team – with no limit to the number of years a player may be kept on the same team.
1.     Salary equal to prior years salary + $5 + (2 * number of consecutive years kept by any team)
a.     Example – player X is paid a salary of $1. The first year that he is kept, he is paid $1 + $5 + (2 * 0 consecutive years kept) = $6. The next year he is kept, he is paid $6 + $5 + (2*1 consecutive years kept) = $13. This pattern continues until player X returns to the draft.
                                            iii.     Any future year draft picks acquired through trades must be counted against the $80 salary keeper limit, but do not count against the maximum (4) players to be carried over
III.           Trades and pickups
a.     Players picked up on waivers will be signed to a salary of $1 for that season. 
b.     During the regular season and playoffs, a $10 buffer will be allowed for each team to go over the salary cap with no penalty (therefore, any team can trade for players that would otherwise make them go over the cap, so long as the team does not exceed $210). The purpose of this rule is to allow teams more freedom when pursuing trades.
                                               i.     This $10 buffer goes away during the offseason, meaning the $80 for resigning players and $120 for draft picks still applies.
c.      All trades must be pre-approved by the front office to ensure they adhere to the salary cap
d.     All trades must not violate the league salary cap with the $10 buffer ($210)
                                               i.     Example – both owners A and B are at the $200 salary cap limit and want to trade player X (salary $40, owner A’s player) for player Y (salary $20, owner B’s player). Owner B must do one of the following;
1.      include additional players whose salaries equal $10
2.      drop players with salaries of >$1, and sign $1 waiver players such that the sum of all player salaries is reduced by $10
3.     have owner A pay at least $10 towards player X’s salary – so that owner A still pays $10 of player X’s salary and owner B pays the remaining $30 of the salary
a.     cash considerations can continue to the next year but no further
                                                                                                     i.     siting the above example, owner A may still pay $10 towards player X’s salary (if that was part of the deal) in the next year, but no further than the one following year
e.     Trades may include draft picks for the following season. Subsequent draft picks included in each trade will be kept track of in the league spreadsheet (see spreadsheet section below). Such transactions must not exceed the salary cap for either team in the current season, or exceed the $80 keeper allotment for the team getting the future pick (thus, somewhat like the NBA, players may be thrown in by virtue of their salary so that neither owner will exceed the salary cap)
                                               i.     If a player is traded for a draft pick, the owner receiving the draft pick must give up a draft pick as well. This is because everyone must have an equal amount of draft picks every year.
                                              ii.     Values of traded draft picks count towards the $80 keeper salary limit for the next season
1.     If a team receives a higher draft pick, then they will have less than $80 for kept players
2.     If a team trades away a higher draft pick, then they will have more than $80 for kept players
IV.            Spreadsheet/League Office
a.     The excel spreadsheet will be updated by the league manager as necessary to reflect the latest league information, including trades
b.     Team tabs show which players play for each team, their salaries, and what draft picks the owner has for the next draft
c.      The League Office will have the power to propose rules changes as needed to address any developments in the league. Rule changes must be approved by a 2/3 majority of members in the league voting on the given measure
V.              Other rules
a.     Any other rules not listed here will be governed by ESPN’s default rule-set
                                               i.     Specific ESPN settings to note are: the non-resetting waiver wire, trade deadlines, trade approval rules etc.
b.     Players on IR do not count against the salary cap
VI.            Fees/Prizes (assuming 10 teams in the league)
a.     The fee for each year will be $50 with all money exchanged at the end of the year, for simplicity sake
b.     The top scoring team each week in the regular season will receive $5 ($5 * 12 = $60)
c.      Nick Vidnovic Bad Beat Pot
                                               i.     The Nick Vidnovic Bad Beat Pot (NVBBP) will run throughout the (12) weeks of the regular season with $5 being paid to the “winner.” If no one wins in a given week, the money will be added to the following weeks pot, with the pot resetting after there is a “winner” ($5 * 12 weeks = $60)
1.      Example – no one wins the pot for the first three weeks, making the pot worth $20 dollars in week four. Someone wins the pot in week four. The week five pot is now worth only $5.
                                              ii.     All money not paid out in the NVBBP will be divided up between the league champion and runner up with 60% going to the champion and 40% going to the runner up
                                            iii.     Scenario - Team A loses to team B. If team B was the highest scoring team in the week AND team A was the second highest scoring team of the week, then team A wins the bad beat pot
                                            iv.     Exception – no players can be benched by team A for the Sunday night and Monday games – except for injuries/to put in a “better” player – in an attempt to throw the game to ensure winning the pot
d.     Each team that makes the playoffs will receive $10 (4 teams * $10 = $40)
e.     In the postseason (both playoff and consolation bracket), each time a team wins a matchup, they receive $10 (for each 2 week matchup won)
                                               i.     Total money paid out for the playoffs – (3 playoff matchups + 7 consolation matchups) * $10 = $100
f.      The remaining money will be divided between the league champion and league runner up
                                               i.     League champion receives $160 + 60% remaining from NVBBP
                                              ii.     League runner up receives $80 + 40% remaining from NVBBP

11/18/2009

NFL Week 11 Picks Part 2

Before I get to the picks for the week, I just want to make a quick fantasy football point. Usually, I am lucky to have a team that scores all the points that I could want. This year, my team scores less than the Cleveland Browns (unless you have been living on the moon for the past 3 months, you know that's not good). Despite having the fewest points scored, I can win my last 2 games (a possibility) and with a little help, can still make the playoffs! I've become the team that I hate every year that makes the playoffs despite being terrible... damn.

Anyway, on to the picks!

Browns (+4) at Lions
I just couldn't resist. Have you ever seen 2 worse teams (that wear NFL uniforms)? This might be the worst game ever played, yet I'm actually hoping that I get it in my area! This is bound to be high comedy. I can just hear the pregame announcer now, "coming up on Fox NFL Sunday, the worst offense in the league (the Browns) tries to get it together with their coach in the hot seat against the worst defense in the league (the Lions). Who will get their second win of the season? Find out next right here on Fox." I used Fox because it would make sense for a game this terrible to be on Fox. I think CBS does a much better job with football on Sundays, or maybe it's just because the AFC tends to put a better product on the field than the NFC (well, except for the Brownies of course). I don't have anything to say about either team other than they are both awful and fighting for last place with each other in most statistical categories. But because the Lions can sometimes find their way over the goal line much like you or I would grope through a dark house and fall down the stairs, I'll take the Lions.
Will - Lions
Lauren - Browns

Steelers (-10) at Chiefs
So can that Todd Haley yell or what? How long do you think until Chiefs management has to look into Haley the same way Kansas is being forced to look into Mangino? I would say by week 15 he completely loses all of his players and stories start to come out. It looks like Polamalu is going to sit this one out. That's alright though because the only receiving threat that the Chiefs possess - Dwayne Bowe - has to sit out 4 games for violating the steroids policy. I feel bad for Bowe because I think he's being cheated by his dealer. I mean, seriously, he's gotten worse! I will say one thing for the Chiefs, at least they got rid of Johnson, and I'm happy that the Bengals picked him up. I was hoping for something to slow the Bengals down and he's just the man to do it (albeit from the inside out...). The Steelers will have a nice bounce back game and I would fear for my health if I were a member of the Chiefs, the Steelers will be out for blood on Sunday. I'll take the Steelers.
Will - Steelers
Lauren - Steelers

Falcons (even) at Giants
Wow, this is one of those games that's going to take 5 hours and be incredibly sloppy. Michael Turner is nursing an injury, second year QB in Matt Ryan is reminding everyone that he's only in his second year (I guess everyone has film on him now), the Giants run game has not been the same this year - Brandon Jacobs picture should be on a milk carton because he hasn't shown up all year, and Eli Manning is... well... he's just terrible. This game will be unwatchable because of many turnovers + neither team being able to run the ball (good Giants D, banged up Falcons RB's, Giants RB's are MIA) + poor QB play (ALOT of incompletions) = long, boring game. I need to move on before I lose the will to live just thinking about this game... but I'll take the Giants since they just lost 4 straight and that's embarrassing.
Will - Giants
Lauren - Giants

Colts (+1) at Ravens
This is a tough game to pick. On the one hand you have the undefeated Colts with what looks like an unstoppable offense. On the other you have a Ravens team who's been hit or miss in all facets of the game. However, Terrell Suggs looks like he might not be able to go after Brady Quinn's huge embarrassing failure of a tackle. You would think that Quinn would be able to avoid situations like this with all the interceptions he throws... but maybe I'm wrong. I'll take the Colts and the point, I just don't think this is the week that the Colts lose their mojo.
Will - Colts
Lauren - Colts

Cardinals (-9) at Rams
This just has trap game written all over it to me. The Rams have been surprisingly frisky of late behind Steven Jackson and his refusal to be tackled. On the other side, the Cardinals live and die by the play of Kurt Warner - who I believe is eligible for Medicare within the next ten minutes. If Warner has a few senior moments like he did against Carolina in week 8 (which, come to think of it, could have just been Warner trying to make Delhomme feel good about himself - he is a good christian and all...). I'm counting on the Cards to lay an egg and Jackson to carry the Rams on his back all the way to a nice little cover of the spread. Rams.
Will - Cardinals
Lauren - Cardinals

Chargers (even) at Broncos
That Jay Cutler trade looks better and better with each passing week, right? Well, unless you like gunslingers who act like a bratty trust fund kids. And don't you kind of miss Rivers and Cutler jawing before games? Reminds me of two sweater vest wearing teenagers at the yacht club arguing over who's dingy scratched who's. Anyway, it looks like Orton and his neckbeard won't be out there on Sunday and that will probably spell disaster for the Broncos. Well, that and the Broncos seem to have come back to earth after that 5-0 start. I think Broncos fans can look forward to a second implosion in as many seasons to not make the playoffs. I think it's obvious, but I'll take the Chargers.
Will - Chargers
Lauren - Broncos

Jets (+11) at Patriots
I think that the Patriots and the "Eff you touchdown" (phrase coined by Bill Simmons of espn.com) will return to form this weekend. After Belichick got dragged through the mud all week by the media, I don't see how he Won't be leading the Patriots to a very lopsided victory this weekend. Keep in mind that the Jets are missing their anchor on D (literally and figuratively as he is a big man for his size), Chris Jenkins, and also start a rookie QB. Now that I think about it, I don't see how this line isn't closer to 15, there's just no way the Patriots don't just blow them out this Sunday to soothe their egos and show that they still have no sportsmanship or respect for their opponents. Patriots.
Will - Patriots
Lauren - Jets

11/17/2009

NFL Week 11 Picks Part 1

Wow, so it's been a while, longer than the last time. Many things have happened since week 6 (the last time I posted). First of all, and for no other reason other than the fact that I'm winning, I think that we are going to do a couple more games for the weekly picks. Just looking at the schedule for the upcoming week, there are 7 matchups that would be fun to pick based on interesting lines, matchups, and, well, just because it's my blog and I pick which games I want to pick against the spread.

Because I have no memory of anything that happened between week 6 and 10 (and to my knowledge I haven't been hit in the head as many times as Brian Westbrook in the last couple of weeks - more on concussions coming up), I guess I'll just focus on a few things that happened during this last weekend of football.

I was in Pittsburgh this last weekend for the Penguins and Steelers games - but I'll save hockey for when the season is over and I know that some people (Will) aren't hockey fans and wouldn't want me to start talking about it in a football blog entry - but I digress. I got to witness firsthand the Bengals beating the Steelers at their (what used to be) their own game. The Bengals offensive and defensive lines blew up the Steelers at the point of attack and without Polamalu, the Steelers D is not nearly as formidable... probably because Polamalu diagnoses a play better than anyone in the league. Sidenote: something that I feel was overlooked until recently when Polamalu started appearing in all those Head and Shoulders commercials is how he talks. His voice is so mellow and soothing that you would never believe that he is one of the hardest hitting and best safeties in the game. His voice is better suited for softly cooing to new born babies while sitting in a rocking chair on the front porch on a warm summer morning with his hair billowing in the breeze (*sigh*) rather than talking about the intricacies of Dick LeBeau's zone blitzing scheme. But that's just my opinion...

In non-Steeler news, concussions and football. I know Malcolm Gladwell just wrote an awesome piece in the NY Times or Post (can't remember which one), but I'm not sure too many of you would have read it and I think that it's a pretty interesting and worthy subject for discussion. To summarize, Gladwell talks about the debilitating long term effects former players feel after sustaining many concussions (and coming back too soon) in their career. New research is suggesting that those that suffer a concussion and come back too soon only set themselves up for more concussions as they will happen more easily if your brain is not allowed to heal properly in the first place. The long term effects of this can be devastating. It has been seen that an oft concussed former player in his 50's has the same brain usage as a dementia sufferer in their 80's. I feel that this is horrifying and easily preventable. If I were the commissioner, I would mandate proper fitting helmets. Watch ANY play in slow motion and you will see the helmets of whoever is running bouncing around as the helmets are not properly sized. I have seen very few players with their helmets snug enough on their heads so that the helmet does what it is intended to do - PROTECT YOUR HEAD! You may have to outlaw certain hairstyles (basically just really thick dreadlocks), but it would go a long way to preventing concussions. OK, I'm done now...

As the great Herm Edwards once said, "You play to win the game!" and that is exactly what the Patriots did by going for it on fourth and 1.5 at the end of the game at their own 28.5. I hate that not only did Belichick get skewered for his decision by the media, but half of them are back tracking after seeing the statistics that say that he made the right decision! And I'm sorry for all you Tedy Bruschi fans out there, but come on, do you seriously think that Belichick just alienated his entire defense by basically saying "I like my chances of getting 1.5 yards against an injured and not very good defense with my all world QB better than my chances of stopping an all universe QB who has my almost equally not as good defense tired from chasing the 6' 5" 225 lb QB's laser, rocket-arm throws over the last few possessions." I understand that Belichick probably got lost in Brady's dreamy eyes during the first time out, which possibly lead to having to burn their last time out (and the subsequent inability to challenge the spot - which was probably a first down). If you were going to burn Belichick for anything, I would say it would be for briefly turning into Andy Reid and burning his last 2 timeouts because of personnel reasons... but hey, hind sight is 50-50 (or something to that effect).

This entry went much longer than I intended, so I'm going to break it up into 2 parts, with part 2 coming on Thursday complete with actual picks for week 11...

10/16/2009

NFL Week 6 Picks

I know I suck, but I've been busy (read: lazy). Anyway, to business. There are, in my opinion, 8 just absolutely awful teams that make me wish the NFL were run like Premier League soccer (with the worst couple teams being relegated to the lower division, replaced by the top couple teams in the lower division - in this case, the CFL... maybe? oh wait, the UFL! problem solved! I'm only half serious, more coming later). These 8 teams - Kansas City, Oakland, Cleveland, Buffalo, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Washington, and Detroit - will probably only collect wins against each other this year. Combined, they are 6-34. If you don't count games that they played each other, they are collectively 0-28! That's absurd. Even more absurd is the duel to the death between JaMarcus Russell and Derek Anderson to see who can set the all time record for worst QB rating in one season. Until last week, it didn't look like much of a contest until Anderson put up the following gem - 2-17, 23 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT. By the way, THEY WON THE GAME 6-3 over the Bills! That's how bad these teams are... ok, I'm done.

Back to the relegation idea, I don't see how this wouldn't improve the NFL. If the 4 teams in the UFL were absorbed into the NFL (so that they received picks 1-4 in the draft, as they would be the worst 4 teams - I assume no one would argue with that), you could relegate the bottom 2 teams to the UFL and move up the 2 teams that made the championship. This would help the NFL in a number of reasons. First off, not only would you have the playoff race at the end of the year, you would also have the bottom dwellers trying desperately to get out of the bottom 2 so that they play in front of NFL crowds next year and not CMU flag football crowds. This, in turn, would force the terrible ownership in the league - Cleveland, Oakland, and Detroit most notably - to hire GMs that are worth something because if the team is terrible year in and year out, they won't stay in the NFL and therefore won't make any money. I can't think of a better motivator than money. Finally, Vegas gets a chance to see if they can support a professional team, although I'm not sure if you want a pro team that close to the gambling capital of the country. That being said, I wish that this would happen to the MLB and NBA much more than I wish for this to happen in the NFL, but that's another issue altogether.

Now, without further ado, on to the picks!

You can see in the sidebar the standings for the year (although this is only 2 weeks...).

Browns (+15) at Steelers
Well, you already know how I feel about the Browns. They're terrible. Please keep in mind that Derek Anderson came in, in the second half of the game in week 3, threw 3 interceptions and won the starting job from there on out. I'm lost for words, the only team with a worse QB is Oakland, but the detestable duo of Anderson and Quinn is giving them a run for their money. In other news, Roethlisberger is throwing a ton this year and I actually hope that Mendenhall has stolen the starting job from Fast (but only when I'm in the open with no one around me, otherwise I tip-toe and move in slow motion) Willie Parker at RB. Polamalu is going to play Sunday with a brace on his knee, but the defense suffered what will probably turn out to be just as big of a blow with the loss of Aaron Smith for the year. Regardless, the Steelers own the Browns and I'd like to think this is the week we see the Steelers of old (after someone tells them there wasn't a rule change, there are still 4 quarters, not 3). I'll take the Steelers.
Will - Browns
Lauren - Steelers

Giants (+3) at Saints
I hear Plantar Fascitis is no joke, combine that with the fact that Eli always looks like he's about to cry (I had to get my shot in somehow, right?) and you get potential problems at QB. Drew Brees shows no signs of slowing down, which leads me to believe that this could turn into a shootout. I think that a shootout favors the Saints, since they have the best QB in the league and have shown that they are for real. That being said, we are talking about a Giants team that can tire out the scoreboard operator too, so this should come down to which defense can get a timely stop in the fourth quarter. I say it's the Saints.
Will - Saints
Lauren - Giants

Cardinals (+3) at Seahawks
Well, here's a matchup of 2 teams that are pretty much never televised on the East coast. If Will weren't one of the people that I'm picking against, I would not have chosen this game (that gives you an idea of how exciting I think this game will be). I see the Seahawks as wildly inconsistent, they live and die by the health of Hasselbeck, which should tell you either how good he is or how bad Seneca Wallace is. As far as I can tell, the Cardinals have not played a game that would really indicate where they stand. Their wins came against the Texans and Jaguars, while their losses came against the Colts (who make a strong argument for being the best team in the league) and the 49ers (who lost last week to a good Falcons team while not having Frank Gore). I guess what I'm trying to say is, I don't believe any team in the NFC West is any good and I'd like to see one of them beat a winning team outside of their division before I begin to take one of them seriously (keep in mind that this is the same Cardinals team that was in the Superbowl last year...). I'll take the Cardinals and the points.
Will - Cardinals
Lauren - Cardinals

Ravens (+3) at Vikings
A battle of 2 teams with purple as their primary color. Now a relevant and potentially inciteful thought, Ray (I'm a violent dirty player that may have murdered a man, but that's ok because I'm a man of God) Lewis and the rest of the defense need to stop taking stupid penalties in the worst possible situations if they want to at least repeat what they did last year. Both of these teams are very good and this will be a hard-hitting, well played, and exciting football game. I don't see this being high scoring only because both of these defenses are more stifling than the offenses are explosive. Who would have thought that Favre would have been able to come back this year and have a repeat of the beginning of last year? Not this guy, although it may have something to do with not reporting a biceps tear that prevented him from throwing the ball further than about 5 yards, but whatever. Also, Joe "the Flying Unibrow" Flacco is orchestrating a now surprisingly frisky offense that has shown flashes with some big plays and big games from Flacco. Now let's see if they can keep it up for the year or if the first few weeks were just a result of taking opposing defensive coordinators by surprise. I'll take the Vikings.
Will - Vikings
Lauren - Vikings

Bears (+3) at Falcons
After starting off a little slow against the Packers, the Bears have come back and are looking pretty good, but so are the Falcons. This will be a good game with 2 teams that seem to be hitting their mid-season stride facing off in Atlanta (think Falcons fans still miss Michael Vick?). Michael Turner is finally playing like the Michael Turner of last year, which makes the Falcons dangerous through the ground and air (especially with the addition of Tony Gonzalez in the off season). Not much insight on this game, but I'll take the Falcons for the reason that I'd rather not pick with Cutler only to see him throw 5 INTs.
Will - Bears
Lauren - Bears

I'm hoping to be more consistent with the entries, maybe I'll even throw a second entry in next week if I'm feeling frisky...